VOL. XLIV
No 32
6 August 2001
US Stocks Decline Revives
Demand Optimism
Early last week crude oil prices
withered as traders were undecided about how the supply-demand balance would
move in the wake of OPEC’s decision to cut supplies by 1mn b/d from 1 September
(MEES, 30 July). All eyes were
scanning the horizons for evidence of a demand pick-up now that refiners are
preparing for winter consumption. Once again, US stocks data provided the hope
markets were looking for: not only was there a strong decline in US crude and
gasoline stocks the previous week, but also there were further revisions to
demand data, leading traders to begin to speculate that the current recession
might prove shallower than generally believed.
The American Petroleum Institute
(API) published its weekly stocks report after markets closed on 31 July, and
the following day both WTI and Brent crude prices did a U-turn and surged
upwards as hedge funds adjusted their positions (see table below). The API report said that in the previous week crude oil stocks fell by
3.5mn barrels, when traders had been expecting a stockbuild of 1.3mn barrels.
While this was viewed as bullish for crude prices following OPEC’s production
agreement, the crude build was readily explained as the delayed effect of
Iraq’s suspension of crude oil loadings throughout June – tankers take about
six weeks to travel from Iraq to the Gulf coast.
More
significantly, the API reported that gasoline stocks declined by 2.95mn
barrels, and that demand stood at a healthy 9.16mn b/d, although gasoline
stocks were still 1.4% above the 10-year average. Demand for the previous four
weeks was reported to be up 2.8% over the same period last year, while year-to-date
consumption was 0.9% higher than last year. This demand strength was
unexpected, given the widespread news about the US economic slowdown, and
suggests that the recent fall in retail gasoline prices has encouraged US drivers
back onto the roads. Another factor was refiners’ reduction of gasoline yields
to maximize middle distillate production.
The API reported a 1.48mn barrels increase in distillate stocks.
In the Weekly Oil Data report of 1
August, JP Morgan analyst Paul Horsnell said that the US gasoline market continues
to be a roller-coaster, and that the surplus of the previous few months has
vanished – the market is beginning to
look tight again. He was also upbeat about demand, based on continuing
recalculations of demand data: “In the bustle of the market reaction to the
weekly figures, the later revisions to demand are normally overlooked. The
latest revision by the US Department of Energy has added 314,000 b/d to May
demand. This follows the 574,000 b/d upwards revision to April demand, and the
419,000 b/d upwards revision to March demand. Demand has not collapsed, it is
very strong and there does seem to be a disconnection between market psychology
and the actual numbers.”
This optimism was reflected during
trading on 2 August, which saw the two main benchmark crude blends bounce back
by about $1/B. This was attributed to hedge funds rushing to balance their
books, having taken a strong short position in recent weeks in the belief that
demand would continue to weaken and crude prices would follow. The price hike appeared to mark an end to a move by NYMEX
speculators to build a strong short position in order to drag crude oil prices
downwards, which was a key factor in OPEC’s decision to reduce output so
sharply (MEES, 23 July).
Meanwhile, OPEC reassured the
markets that it was on standby to satisfy any demands for increased supply volumes.
OPEC President Chakib Khelil,
Algeria’s Energy Minister, told reporters on 31 July that the organization was
prepared to increase oil production if the US economy showed signs of a
recovery. Mr Khelil said, “with this confidence perhaps the economy can restart
growth at the end of this year. In this case, I think OPEC will have to increase
production to meet this demand.” He added, “what we are looking for is the
stabilization of prices: if it’s $24/B,
$23/B or $22/B that’s fine by us, as long as it’s stable.” OPEC
Secretary-General Ali Rodriguez said on 30 July that the organization would
take “whatever measure is necessary” to maintain stable oil prices at its
scheduled ministerial meeting on 26 September.
Earlier the oil ministers of Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Mexico met in Geneva
to discuss the supply-demand outlook. The meeting was greeted by markets as
something of a curiosity. While Mexico’s output is expected to fall because of
technical problems in the Cantarell field (MEES,
30 July) and Saudi Arabia is the main driver of OPEC’s price stabilization
policy, it appeared to be Venezuela’s initiative to debate how to
convince non-OPEC producers to trim their own output. The meeting’s official
press communiqué (see below) was seen as something of a non-event after the
fireworks of the full OPEC agreement. Venezuela’s Oil Minister Alviro Silva
told Dow Jones on 30 July of his hope
to persuade Norway, Russia, Angola, Oman and Kazakhstan to copy the OPEC
cutbacks move, but this was judged to be a political position for a domestic
and US audience rather than a viable proposition.
Settlement Prices For Benchmark Crudes ($/B)
|
Date |
September WTI |
September Brent |
OPEC Basket |
|
27 July |
27.02 |
25.19 |
23.87 |
|
30 July |
26.63 |
24.96 |
23.63 |
|
31 July |
26.35 |
24.69 |
23.48 |
|
1 August |
26.77 |
24.96 |
23.49 |
|
2 August |
27.71 |
26.13 |
24.42 |
Joint Communiqué of the Secretary
of Energy of Mexico, the Minister of Oil and Mineral Resources of Saudi Arabia
and the Minister of Energy and Mines of Venezuela
Geneva, Switzerland, 29 July 2001
Continuing with their periodic
consultations, the Secretary of Energy of Mexico, Ernesto Martens, the Minister
of Oil and Mineral Resources of Saudi Arabia, Ali al-Naimi, and the Minister of
Energy and Mines of Venezuela, Alviro
Silva, met in Geneva, Switzerland,
to analyze the evolution of the international oil market.
The Ministers agreed that the
recent decision taken by OPEC to stabilize the international oil market was
timely, given the slowdown of the world economy and its effect on market
fundamentals. Over the past few months, demand has continued to fall while
supply has been rising as a result of stocks build-up beyond expectations, the
resumption of Iraqi exports and the increase in non-OPEC production. Thus, the
market has shown signs of entering a new cycle of instability, which has
warranted this timely action.
The Ministers reiterated the
importance of stability as a precondition to ensuring a well-supplied oil
market in the short- and long-term. They affirmed their commitment to fair
price levels that allow the world economy to resume its growth while permitting
investments to further guarantee oil supply in the long run. They recalled that
a consensus has been reached within the consumers-producers dialogue that price
levels within the established band are acceptable to all.
The Ministers agreed to continue
monitoring market fundamentals and adopt any measure needed, in a timely manner,
to ensure a stable and adequately supplied oil market, for the benefit of both
producers and consumers. Moreover, they made an appeal to major oil producers
to continue to cooperate in the effort to maintain the stability of the market.
The Ministers underscored the importance of enhancing the consumer-producer
dialogue, in order to ensure understanding and promote transparency and market
stability.
The Ministers expressed their
appreciation to the permanent Mission of Mexico to the International
Organizations in Geneva for hosting the meeting.
Copyright
© 2001 Middle East Economic Survey